Posted on

Persuasion, Jane Austen’s evocation of a lost romance


Abstract submitted for JASNA AGM 2018

I would like to present to the Kansas AGM my contention, explored in Jane and D’Arcy, that Jane Austen’s Persuasion is an allegory based on her own life experience. It is the sad and lamentable story of a lost love that eventually ends in happiness when the long absent hero returns. Following a series of embarrassing romances and encounters, he eventually reciprocates with a declaration that he has always loved her, giving the story a fairy-tale, happy-ever-after ending.

There is another ending to Jane Austen’s story that was too painful for her to explore. It is her own real-life story in which the hero, forced from her life by the Austen family, never returned. At the very early age of fourteen, Jane fell in love with D’Arcy Wentworth, with whom she had an exciting and eventful love affair. The Austen family, to protect their good name, enforced their separation. Jane was persuaded to abandon her lover and their affair was never to be mentioned again.

Two weeks after they parted D’Arcy sailed for Australia; heartbroken, Jane remained confined within the family circle and waited for him to return to her. D’Arcy remained the fixed star in her firmament, the great love of her life.

Jane was forbidden from ever telling the story of her youthful romance, but it was the story she most wanted to explore and record. She included many events from this early period of her life in her three books of Juvenilia. Recognising the potential damage these might do to their reputation, the Austen family withheld her Juvenilia from publication for more than a hundred years, the third and final volume was not released until 1951, 134 years after Jane’s death.

Jane Austen was more circumspect in her late thirties and forties when she published four novels anonymously. She included in each shards of the emotions and events from her romance with D’Arcy Wentworth. In Pride & Prejudice she named him Mr Darcy, and revealed he was a cousin of Earl Fitzwilliam, in Persuasion she named him Captain Wentworth.

After Jane died her family destroyed much of her correspondence, none of her letters from D’Arcy remain. Cassandra took the scissors to her letters from Jane, cutting out almost all mentions of him.

Jane’s letters at the time Pride & Prejudice was published reveal her fear of angry criticism from her family. She kept Persuasion to herself, she did not invite members of her family to read the manuscript. It revealed her ongoing relationship with D’Arcy, it celebrated them being reunited, married. Her imagined happy ending declared that she had never stopped loving D’Arcy despite all the Austen’s efforts and opposition.

Her brother Henry published Persuasion after Jane’s death, he gave it the name Persuasion. He knew the great burden of guilt and sadness Jane had carried since she was a teenager for being persuaded by her father and family to turn D’Arcy away.

The secret of her romance with D’Arcy remained hidden until the Wentworth family decided to set the record straight, it was published for the first time in 2017 in Australia, in Jane & D’Arcy.

My presentation will describe parallels between the true story of Jane and D’Arcy and that of Persuasion, the themes of distance and the passing of the years, of opportunities lost, of a young girl being persuaded by someone she trusts to give ground against her own desire, of the “loss of bloom” that follows heartbreak, of resignation and confinement, of constancy and inconstancy, and the powerful emotions Persuasion reveals of Jane’s despair, frustration and anger.…

Posted on

A new date to celebrate Australia Day

To the Editor,
The Sydney Morning Herald

A Date Worth Considering

The 7th of November is worth considering as an alternative date for Australia Day. On that evening in 1825, Governor Sir Thomas Brisbane attended a farewell dinner in the Long Room of Nash’s Woolpack Inn at Parramatta, given in his honour by a group of emancipists, former convicts who had served their time.[i]

On 26 January we celebrate Governor Arthur Phillip coming ashore from the First Fleet and raising the Union Jack. On other public holidays we honour millions of our young men who served, were killed, wounded or taken prisoner in British and American Wars. In comparison dinner at Parramatta may seem a very modest occasion to remember, but it was a significant milestone for the future of Australia, for our society and our values.

On Australia Day the 750 convicts carried on the First Fleet barely rank a mention. They were the first shipment of the 162,000 convicts transported here between 1788 and the mid 1850s. Most had been convicted of petty crimes, and many were political prisoners. They were sent to stay, no provision was made for them to return home after they had served their sentences. Today their descendents make up around 20% of our population.

Governor Lachlan Macquarie, who arrived on New Year’s Day 1810, recognised the importance of former convicts to the Colony. In April 1810 he wrote to Lord Castlereagh: I was very much surprised and Concerned, on my Arrival here, at the extraordinary and illiberal Policy I found had been adopted by all the Persons who had preceded me in Office respecting those Men who had been originally sent out to this Country as Convicts, but who, by long Habits of Industry and total Reformation of Manners, had not only become respectable, but by Many Degrees the most Useful Members of the Community. Those persons have never been Countenanced or received into Society.

I have nevertheless, taken upon my self to adopt a new Line of Conduct, Conceiving that Emancipation, when United with Rectitude and long-tried good Conduct, should lead a Man back to that Rank in Society which he had forfeited, and do away, in as far as the Case will admit, All Retrospect of former bad Conduct. [ii]

Macquarie’s recognition of the emancipists made him many enemies within the military and among the Exclusives, the self appointed upper class of Sydney. The mailbags of the Colonial Office spilled over with their petitions and letters of complaint.

In 1823, Britain sent John Bigge to the Colony and review its administration. He was instructed to constantly bear in mind that Transportation to New South Wales is intended as a severe Punishment applied to various Crimes, and as such must be rendered an Object of real Terror to all classes of the community. [iii]

Bigge was asked to consider the Propriety of admitting into Society Persons, who originally came to the Settlement as Convicts… I am aware that the Conduct of the Governor in this respect, however approved by the Government at home, has drawn down upon him the Hostility of many persons, who hold association with the Convicts under any circumstances to be a degradation.[iv]

The first volume of his report, State of the Colony, was tabled in the House of Commons on 19 June 1822. By then Macquarie had left New South Wales, to die two years later in London, a broken man.

Bigge rejected Macquarie’s vision of emancipists as the backbone of the growing Colony, and his aspiration to return them to society with full rights as British subjects. Instead he recommended an end to their recognition, and the suspension of any progress in their legal rights. Emancipists were to have no access to Government appointments, they were to be excluded from land grants, and not permitted to fill public office.

Bigge recommended increasing the salutary terror of transportation. Conditions for convicts were to be made more oppressive: flogging increased; all pardons, tickets of leave, early release and remissions of sentence discontinued or repudiated, as they diminished the effect of the punishment of transportation.

Sir Thomas Brisbane, appointed as Governor on 1 December 1821, was given clear instructions to break with Macquarie’s policy towards emancipists. He was forbidden to invite them to his table; he could not grant land to ex-convicts, appoint them as magistrates, or to any office of responsibility.

Brisbane was recalled in May 1825 and he arranged to leave the Colony in December. As the time drew near, the leading Exclusive settlers planned a public dinner to farewell him. When Brisbane learnt that emancipists were to be excluded from the dinner he tactfully asked the committee to reconsider, and to accept six of their representatives. The Exclusives refused to be conciliatory, and on 23 October, they cancelled their farewell dinner.

The emancipists proposed a second public farewell dinner where they could thank the Governor and pay their respects to him. On 26 October, Governor Brisbane formally accepted their farewell address in the presence of a large number of public officials, civil and military; merchants and members of the public. The address was published in the press and the Governor accepted the emancipists’ invitation to dinner.

On the evening of 7 November 1825, a hundred guests attended the official farewell dinner for Governor Brisbane at the Woolpack Inn in Parramatta. Despite the Exclusives boycott most of the Colony’s leading officials attended.

Brisbane had obeyed instructions not to invite emancipists to dine at his table, but this evening he was ready to break bread with them. It was a significant event in the evolution of Colony, despite Bigge’s recommendations, the representative of the British Crown gave formal recognition to the emancipists, discrediting the pretensions of the Exclusives.

Brisbane recognised the timeliness of their desire for rights and recognition, he agreed to support their claims for the extension of their civil rights, and the desire of the colonists for colonial independence. He undertook to take up these issues with the Government when he returned to England. I shall conceive it my duty to make such representations to His Majesty’s Ministers.

Brisbane declared that the Free Institutions of Great Britain should not any longer be withheld from the Colony. I am decidedly of the opinion that it has arrived at a state fit for their reception. He closed with a toast to the Happiness and Prosperity to New South Wales. [v]

It was a political turning point, the emancipists had the numbers, talent and wealth, and on this evening their importance for the future of the Colony was recognised by Brisbane’s viceregal patronage. They had achieved ascendancy over the Exclusives.

On his return to London, Brisbane supported their campaign for political recognition and rights. His farewell dinner heralded the historic shift of Australia from a penal colony to a viable mature society. November 7, 1825 marked the beginning of our inclusive, just and free society.

17 January 2018

[i] Wal Walker, Such Talent & Such Success, Jane & D’Arcy Vol 2, Chapter 14, Sydney, Arcana Gallery, 2017.

[ii] Governor Macquarie to Viscount Castlereagh, 30 April 1810, Historical Records of New South Wales, Volume VII, page 356.

[iii] Earl Bathurst to Commissioner Bigge, 6 January 1819, Historical Records of Australia, Series I, Volume X, page 4.

[iv] Earl Bathurst to Commissioner Bigge, 30 January 1819. Private letter, ibid, page 11.

[v] Governor Brisbane, Reply to Address of Farewell, 26 October 1825, Historical Records of Australia, Series IV, Volume I, page 629.



Posted on


Melbourne Launch, Such Talent 

Such Talent & Such Success was launched in Melbourne at Avenue Books, Albert Park, on Monday 25 September.

Author Talk Bathurst

On Saturday, 19 April at 2.00pm, Wal Walker gave a talk about Jane & D’Arcy at the Bathurst Library.

Author Talk Buderim

On Friday 4 August, Wal Walker gave an author talk in the sunny courtyard of Books of Buderim.

Sydney Launch, Such Talent 

On 28 July 2017, at 10.00am, Such Talent & Such Success was officially launched in the Great Hall of the University of Sydney. Pro Chancellor Dorothy Hoddinott welcomed Jane Austen lovers, students and staff, Wentworth family and friends and visitors, and invited former Chancellor of the University and former New South Wales Governor,  Professor the Hon. Dame Marie Bashir, to launch the second and final volume of Jane & D’Arcy.

Author Talks

At 5.30pm, 18 July 2017, the 200th anniversary of the death of Jane Austen in Winchester, author Wal Walker gave a talk at the Sydney Institute, Level 40, Governor Phillip Tower, entitled
Jane & D’Arcy : Fact or Fiction.

At 6.30pm, 20 July 2017,  he spoke about Jane & D’Arcy at the Leichhardt Library, 7-15 Wetherill Street, Leichhardt.

Melbourne Launch, Folly

Folly was launched in Melbourne on Monday 15th May 2017 at Readings in Hawthorn.  It was attended by Wentworth family and friends, Jane Austen lovers and a descendant of her brother Charles.

Canberra Launch. Folly

Folly was launched in Canberra, the National Capital, at Paperchain Bookstore, Manuka, on Friday 12th May 2017.  It was attended by Wentworth family members and Jane Austen lovers and aficionados, who had a range of questions.

Sydney Launch, Folly

On 7 April 2017, Folly is not always Folly was officially launched by Professor the Hon. Dame Marie Bashir, the former Governor of New South Wales, at Parliament House in Sydney, the house D’Arcy built as part of the Rum Hospital, where he lived for some years. The launch was attended by over sixty of his descendants, and friends.






Posted on

I assure you that she did

Link to the original article: The Guardian – 24 November 2016

An article in The Guardian on 24 November 2016 stated there was no evidence that Jane Austen ever visited Wentworth Woodhouse in South Yorkshire.

Wal Walker’s reply in The Guardian – 27 November 2016

In April 2017, Folly is not Always Folly, the first volume of Jane & D’Arcy, will be published in Sydney, with the second volume, Such Talent & Such Success, to follow later in the year.

Jane & D’Arcy is D’Arcy Wentworth’s family story, written by one of his descendants. Folly is not Always Folly recounts her meetings with William Wentworth Fitzwilliam, the 4th Earl Fitzwilliam of Wentworth Woodhouse, and her visit there, the date and the occasion.

Jane & D’Arcy will offer a key to much of Jane Austen’s writing, and the powerful emotional songlines that thread across her writings, which even today remain largely unexplored.